Teaching evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: 4. Appraising the evidence for papers on therapy.

You are here

Practicing evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) requires practitioners to develop an ability to appraise the quality of published studies addressing questions related to their clinical practice. This paper describes a process by which CAM practitioners can determine the validity of studies evaluating therapeutic interventions. The process requires asking two broad questions: (1). Do the treatment and control group begin with the same prognosis? and (2). Do the treatment and control group remain the same with respect to important prognostic factors? Answering these questions requires determining whether studies used effective randomization, preserved randomization through intention-to-treat analyses, used blinding, and had adequate follow-up of trial participants.PMID: 12470449
Title of abstract: 
Teaching evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: 4. Appraising the evidence for papers on therapy.
Author: 
Wilson K, Mills EJ, Ross C, Guyatt G.
Affiliations: 
University of Toronto, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, McMaster University
Citedate: 
Monday, December 31, 2001 - 19:00
Citation: 
J Altern Complement Med. 2002;8(5):673-9.

CCNM logo

CONNECT WITH US

Talk to a student services advisor today by emailing info@ccnm.edu

The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine

Educating naturopathic doctors in North America for almost 40 years

1255 Sheppard Avenue East, Toronto, Ontario M2K 1E2

College: (416) 498-1255 I 1 (866) 241-2266 (toll-free)

Clinic: (416) 498-9763

AANMC
Member of the Association of
Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges