Research Methodology | CCNM

Research Methodology

You are here

Lessons from Outside and Within: Exploring Advancements in Methodology for Naturopathic Medicine Clinical Research


Naturopathy is a mixture of both traditional and complementary medicine. It incorporates a broad set of health care practices that may or may not be traditional to that country or conventional medicine and are not fully integrated into the dominant health care system. Research required to evaluate or substantiate naturopathic medicine may not fall under the testing of randomized clinical trials, which opens up discussions on what is the best practice for research in naturopathic medicine.

Naturopathy Special Interest Group Research Capacity and Needs Assessment Survey


Despite recent shifts in regulation and recognition of the role that naturopathy plays in health care delivery in Canada, comparatively little research has been conducted regarding individuals who conduct naturopathy-related research. A survey was undertaken to better understand the needs and capacity of these individuals to conduct more research.

Establishing an international research collaborative for naturopathy: The International Research Consortium of Naturopathic Academic Clinics (IRCNAC)

Naturopathy is a system of health-care through which practitioners apply core philosophies, theories and principles to integrate medical knowledge with natural treatment options. In recent years the naturopathic community has developed a stronger international coherence.

Working with Toronto neighbourhoods toward developing indicators of community capacity.

Often the goal of health and social development agencies is to assess communities and work with them to improve community capacity. Particularly for health promoters working in community settings and to ensure consistency in the definition of health promotion, the evaluation of health promotion programmes should be based on strengths and assets, yet existing information for planning and evaluation purposes usually focuses on problems and deficits.

The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement.

If randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are to fulfill their potential to allow health care providers to make informed inferences about the validity of the trials upon which they base their clinical practice, then the reporting of key methodological factors must improve. The revised Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) were developed to improve the suboptimal reporting of RCTs. We aimed to determine the extent to which RCTs report key methodological factors included in the revised CONSORT recommendations following publication of these recommendations.

Systematically reviewing qualitative studies complements survey design: exploratory study of barriers to paediatric immunization

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Designing survey questions requires content expertise, awareness of previous qualitative literature, and piloting. We examined surveys addressing parental barriers to vaccinating children to determine if they comprehensively included themes identified in published qualitative studies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of 12 electronic databases and compared questions asked in eligible surveys identified to issues raised in qualitative studies.

Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the extent to which components of composite end points in randomized controlled trials vary in importance to patients, the frequency of events in the more and less important components, and the extent of variability in the relative risk reductions across components.DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Cardiovascular randomized controlled trials published in the Lancet, Annals of Internal Medicine, Circulation, European Heart Journal, JAMA, and New England Journal of Medicine, from 1 January 2002 to 30 June 2003.

Epidemiology and reporting of randomized trials employing re-randomization of patient groups

Trials employing re-randomization of some or all participants provide opportunities for determining optimal dosing and dosing schedules, potential disease modifying effects, direct comparisons between drugs, and salvage therapy for patients failing their assigned treatments. To date, no data exists about their prevalence, epidemiology, or quality. We undertook a systematic review of all trials re-randomizing patients. Using explicit search criteria, we searched 11 electronic databases independently, in duplicate.

Guidelines to case report writing for naturopathic doctors

Case reports play an important role in disseminating information to the medical community. Given the wide variety of naturopathic clinical practice, case reports offer an excellent opportunity to share clinical insights from naturopathic doctors. Typically, unique and rare events or patterns are depicted regarding different aspects of a case, including: symptomatology, pathophysiology, treatment(s), and outcome, including adverse effects. In this paper we elaborate on what a case report is, why one is conducted, and provide a brief set of guidelines on how one is written.

Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the process of development, content, and methods of implementation of reporting guidelines for health research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review of publications describing health research reporting guidelines developed using consensus.


CCNM logo


Talk to a student services advisor today by emailing

Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine

Educating naturopathic doctors in North America for over 40 years

1255 Sheppard Avenue East, Toronto, Ontario M2K 1E2

College: (416) 498-1255 I 1 (866) 241-2266 (toll-free)

Clinic: (416) 498-9763

Member of the Association of
Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges